Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Evangeline's avatar

This is the discussion Ive waited for. It has to start. The people need to begin to see reality, as mentioned here, the false church, and consider what next. We didnt choose this, they did, but we now should discuss what next. Spoiler: there are no easy fixes

John of Rochester's avatar

Well said Nicolas! I wish all the best in this new endeavour.

Padre Pio of Pietrelcina foretold it in the 1960s: “Satan has been introduced into the bosom of the Church and within a very short time will come to rule a false church.”

Indeed, he has and he is ruling it now. The latest papal election was invalid on two counts. One because the the cardinals violated Pope JPII papal law on elections Universi Dominici Gregis by having 133 cardinals voting when the maximum allowed is 120 and two because they elected a candidate who had made statements against catholic doctrine (Fiducia Supplicans, Amoris Laetitia etc), contrary to Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Oficio.

Because that a man is pope is not a presumption of fact but a conclusion of the law, and the law was not followed in the election of May 8th, 2025. Jesus himself confirms the juridical nature of the Church when he tells St Peter in Matthew 18:18 “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heave, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heave.”

https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/01/project-save-rome/

So what solution do we have? The cardinals who did not vote can elect a new pope, or if they do not act the failful of Rome can exercise their right to do the same. Pope Nicolas II’s Bull In Nome Domine states that in cases where the election by the cardinals is not pure, sincere and free, the faithful of Rome have the right to assemble and elect a Catholic pope, just as was done in the first millenium.

https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/11/pope-nicholas-iii-infallibly-taught-that-faithful-can-elect-a-catholic-pope/

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?